Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
DiscussionsAccessExcelInfoPathOutlookPowerPointPublisherWord
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
Outlook ExpressInternet ExplorerWindowsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

MS Office Forum / Word / Numbering / May 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Has automatic numbering been fixed in in Word 2007?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Deborah Salverda - 23 May 2007 05:29 GMT
Hey there,

I have been playing around with Word 2007 and am curious about your
experiences with automatic numbering. I've heard that certain improvements
have been made but that it doesn't look like numbering has actually been
fixed.

Based a post about list levels on Microsoft's Word Blog I have a suspicion
that it hasn't:
"When you edit a multilevel list, Word creates a copy of the original list
and makes the changes to that copy."

That sounds similar to what causes all the trouble with numbering in
previous versions of Word.

So, how robust are the list styles and the automatic multi-level lists in
Word 2007? Is it safe to let the people for whom I developing templates use
them or will I end up having to spend hours fixing up their horribly tangled
lists much like I do currently.

thanks,
deborah
Cliff - 30 May 2007 20:25 GMT
I haven't noticed much of an improvement in lists in Word 2007. I get the
following problems with flat lists and styles:
1. adding a new list of a certain style causes numbering in other lists
using the style later ir the document to change
2. restarting the erroneously renumbered lists at 1 will cause a them to
switch to a different style (and applying the original style switches it
away from starting at 1)
3. hanging indents change for no apparent reason on the first item in a list

Of course, if you create a unique style for every list you use, you can get
around some of these problems (but then again, that defeats the whole
purpose of styles!)

> Hey there,
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> thanks,
> deborah
Herb Tyson [MVP] - 31 May 2007 04:39 GMT
When I saw the switch to XML, I had high hopes for numbering. But, it still
seems as seriously brain dead as ever.  SEQ fields are a lot more reliable
and predictable, albeit more trouble.

Signature

Herb Tyson MS MVP
Author of the Word 2007 Bible
Blog: http://word2007bible.herbtyson.com
Web: http://www.herbtyson.com

>I haven't noticed much of an improvement in lists in Word 2007. I get the
>following problems with flat lists and styles:
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>> thanks,
>> deborah

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.