Dear Word Heretic.
Some time ago I have tried to eliminate the problem
with own style definition. For each list within the document
I created a dedicated style utilizing the nummeration formatting.
It did not help.
Inspired by your hint I saved the document as a plain text file.
I deleted (utilizing the window's notepad)
all formatting remainings in form of numbering digits and similar.
As expected the zero byte chains disappeared.
Each line finished with 0xd 0xa sequence (carriage return, new lin
control bytes).
Each document's byte was stored on single byte. All checks done wit
hex viewer.
That's fine I thought. Then I opened the plain text .txt file in th
Word,
made some formatting actions (because the Word has autmatically applie
paragraph intedention,
distances before paragraph which i did not wish to myself) and saved i
in the Word format.
The list format I have not applied yet. I needed to have the contro
about
what the Word is creating at each critical step.
I opened the new Word document in the Hex-Viewer and the old, wel
known
problems were back.
Document areas with each character stored on two bytes and areas with
characters stored on single byte. Long zero bytes chains occuring
some number of paragraphs. I was no more motivated to apply th
listing
format.
I suppose the Word is generating some faults in the document's content
(invisible for the user) which in turn cause the list do not function
properly.
chrizi
G'day chrizio <chrizio.12qhqc@nospam.WordForums.com>,
WOW! You are getting SERIOUS here.
>Each line finished with 0xd 0xa sequence (carriage return, new line
>control bytes).
Good, this ideal. The ASCII strip is way too excessive, but 100%
effective :-)
>Document areas with each character stored on two bytes and areas with
>characters stored on single byte. Long zero bytes chains occuring
>some number of paragraphs.
This is Word letting some free space for future para formats. It's an
empty 'manual formatting' box. I am surprised at 'long' though. If I
was to count up the space taken for a full para format it would be
some bytes though. Also, any other objects mid para may physically
locate themselves (definition wise) at the end of para.
Yes, Word's numbering is screwy - but it CAN be made to work. Each
list of the same appearance belongs to the SAME list template.
Proc 1
1 Do this
2 Do that
3 Do the other
blah blah
Proc 2
1 Fiddle this
2 Fiddle that
This is ONE LIST. ONE LIST - TWO RESTARTS! Yeah?
This is two lists:
1) Hey babe
2) Yeah babe
3) Sweet babe
1- What the?
2- Where the?
3- How the?
Two different appearances = two list definitions.
Steve Hudson - Word Heretic
Want a hyperlinked index? S/W R&D? See WordHeretic.com
steve from wordheretic.com (Email replies require payment)
chrizio reckoned:
>Dear Word Heretic.
>
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>------------------------------------------------
>~~ Message posted from http://www.WordForums.com/
OK. In this case there is a single list in the document.
All my "lists" (I used to call them lists) have the same formatting.
This list is although broken on four places.
The broking lines are paragraphs are very simple
and contain only one word (sublist heading).
List positions following headings starts with 1 value.
The document is constructed as follows:
Document heading (one line paragraph)
Sublist #1 heading (one line paragraph)
1. Sublist #1 point 1
2. Sublist #1 point 2
3. Sublist #1 point 3
..
..
127. Sublist #1 point 127
Sublist #2 heading (one line paragraph)
1. Sublist #2 point 1
2. Sublist #2 point 2
3. Sublist #2 point 3
..
..
183. Sublist #2 point 183
Sublist #3 heading (one line paragraph)
1. Sublist #3 point 1
2. Sublist #3 point 2
3. Sublist #3 point 3
..
..
13. Sublist #3 point 13
Sublist #4 heading (one line paragraph)
1. Sublist #4 point 1
2. Sublist #4 point 2
3. Sublist #4 point 3
..
..
187. Sublist #4 point 187
Sublist #5 heading (one line paragraph)
1. Sublist #5 point 1
2. Sublist #5 point 2
3. Sublist #5 point 3
This is all right.
But why does the list start suddenly with 1 value:
Sublist #1 heading
1. Sublist #1 point 1
2. Sublist #1 point 2
3. Sublist #1 point 3
..
15. Sublist #1 point 15
1. Sublist #1 point 16 <--- this is WRONG
17. Sublist #1 point 17
..
127. Sublist #1 point 127
... no issue
Sublist #4 heading
1. Sublist #4 point 1
2. Sublist #4 point 2
3. Sublist #4 point 3
..
178. Sublist #4 point 178
1. Sublist #4 point 179 <--- this is WRONG
180. Sublist #4 point 180
...
187. Sublist #4 point 187
..... no issue
I'm trying to reproduce the problem,
and today I manage it much more seldom as some days before.
Why
Word Heretic - 10 Mar 2004 07:25 GMT
G'day chrizio <chrizio.12u72f@nospam.WordForums.com>,
Caused by broken list templates. These have been improving ever since
the release of Word 2k, and many patches since. When it can't re-use
the list, it just creates another list template and away you go.
Normally caused from extensive editing (especially FnR) throughout the
list text. Re-apply the style to the para and it should be fine.
There's some code via the free stuff on my website for restarting
lists after headings which is well used by many technical writers.
Steve Hudson - Word Heretic
Want a hyperlinked index? S/W R&D? See WordHeretic.com
steve from wordheretic.com (Email replies require payment)
chrizio reckoned:
>OK. In this case there is a single list in the document.
>All my "lists" (I used to call them lists) have the same formatting.
[quoted text clipped - 86 lines]
>------------------------------------------------
>~~ Message posted from http://www.WordForums.com/