If you're talking about applying a border to "Text," you have no choice.
This is not really a border in the same sense as the paragraph borders; it
is a convenient way to apply Word's EQ \x (box) field. If you use the field
itself, you can at least (by using switches) choose the sides you want the
border to appear on (any combination of top, bottom, left, and/or right),
but you still can't change the distance from text. I've never tried to
create a style (paragraph or character) with a text border, but if MS says
it can't be done, I'd assume that was correct.
--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)

Signature
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
Word MVP FAQ site: http://www.mvps.org/word
Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so
all may benefit.
> Suzanne,
>
[quoted text clipped - 78 lines]
> >> object and a border when using the "Text border" as
> >> employed in a Style?
Suzanne,
Thank you for your help.
I would like to correct a couple of points:
1. Microsoft has not responded to my question.
If they do, I would hope that they would
at least know that one *CAN* apply a border
to a text object by use of a Style.
2. Applying a border to "Text Objects" using
Styles *IS* possible. Please try the quick
and dirty workaround that I discovered by
accident (described in my original posting).
Thanks again for taking the time to respond.
>If you're talking about applying a border to "Text," you have no choice.
>This is not really a border in the same sense as the paragraph borders; it
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>Suzanne S. Barnhill
>Microsoft MVP (Word)
>> Suzanne,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 78 lines]
>> >> object and a border when using the "Text border" as
>> >> employed in a Style?
Suzanne S. Barnhill - 27 Nov 2003 21:35 GMT
I thought you were quoting Word's Help or a KB article.
--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)

Signature
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
Word MVP FAQ site: http://www.mvps.org/word
Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so
all may benefit.
> Suzanne,
>
[quoted text clipped - 130 lines]
> as
> >> >> employed in a Style?
Though I hate to admit it, all of the gibberish
in my original posting was purely of my own
creation. I only wish I could claim that English
is my second language (it's not).
>I thought you were quoting Word's Help or a KB article.
>Suzanne S. Barnhill
>Microsoft MVP (Word)
>> Suzanne,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>> >Suzanne S. Barnhill
>> >Microsoft MVP (Word)
Suzanne,
Thank you mentioning the EQ \X option. Though
it does not solve my problem, I discovered that
this approach affords a greater distance between
the text and the border than applying a border
to a text object.
If you haven't compared it, you can make the
following test:
Insert a field with the following parameters:
{EQ \X \to \bo \le \ri (This is a test)}
Immediately below this, enter the same text
string ("This is a test") and then apply a
"border" around it using:
Format | Borders and Shading | Box | Apply to: | Text
I *much* prefer the appearance of the former
approach.
As my luck would have it, I cannot employ this
novel technique via a "style" like I can using
the text boarder approach (i.e., in the same
manner that I am able to use the text border
workaround described in my original posting).
In any case, I learned something new about
Microsoft Word.
Thanks again.
>Word's EQ \x (box) field [...] but you still can't
>change the distance from text.
>Suzanne S. Barnhill
>Microsoft MVP (Word)
>> Suzanne,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 78 lines]
>> >> object and a border when using the "Text border" as
>> >> employed in a Style?
Suzanne S. Barnhill - 28 Nov 2003 15:38 GMT
Note that the \to \bo \le \ri switches are not necessary. If you omit all
switches, the default is a border on all four sides. You use the switches
only when you want borders on just selected sides.
--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)

Signature
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
Word MVP FAQ site: http://www.mvps.org/word
Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so
all may benefit.
> Suzanne,
>
[quoted text clipped - 133 lines]
> as
> >> >> employed in a Style?
That makes sense. Thanks!
>Note that the \to \bo \le \ri switches are not
necessary. If you omit all
>switches, the default is a border on all four sides.
You use the switches
>only when you want borders on just selected sides.
>Suzanne S. Barnhill
>Microsoft MVP (Word)
>> anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com wrote in message
>> news:895f01c3b580$b36fb630$a601280a@phx.gbl...
>> Suzanne,
>>
>> Thank you mentioning the EQ \X option. Though
>> it does not solve my problem, I discovered that
>> this approach affords a greater distance between
>> the text and the border than applying a border
>> to a text object.
>>
>> If you haven't compared it, you can make the
>> following test:
>>
>> Insert a field with the following parameters:
>>
>> {EQ \X \to \bo \le \ri (This is a test)}
>>
>> Immediately below this, enter the same text
>> string ("This is a test") and then apply a
>> "border" around it using:
>>
>> Format | Borders and Shading | Box | Apply to: |
Text
>>
>> I *much* prefer the appearance of the former
>> approach.
>>
>> As my luck would have it, I cannot employ this
>> novel technique via a "style" like I can using
>> the text boarder approach (i.e., in the same
>> manner that I am able to use the text border
>> workaround described in my original posting).
>>
>> In any case, I learned something new about
>> Microsoft Word.
>>
>> Thanks again.
>> >Word's EQ \x (box) field [...] but you still can't
>> >change the distance from text.
>> >Suzanne S. Barnhill
>> >Microsoft MVP (Word)