Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
DiscussionsAccessExcelInfoPathOutlookPowerPointPublisherWord
DirectoryUser Groups
Related Topics
Outlook ExpressInternet ExplorerWindowsMS Server ProductsMore Topics ...

MS Office Forum / Word / Page Layout / April 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Table of Contents -won't behave + spurious section breaks

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Annamarie Pluhar - 31 Mar 2005 21:05 GMT
I'm working on learning how to use TOC functionality. I have been reading
various articles on TOC on the MVP site - however I am testing with a
document that was sent by email by a colleague.

TOC function won't work at all. Is this because I don't have the .dot file
for the file on my computer?
Every time I try to set TOC levels they don't "stick".

Colleague also tells me that the doc adds continuous section breaks for no
reason that he can find. I don't know what his skill level is, but he said
he was on phone with MS for 2 hours.  Perhaps he simply has a broken/buggy
template?

I have to work with this doc.. suggestions welcome.

Annamarie
Instructional Designer
Jezebel - 31 Mar 2005 22:59 GMT
> TOC function won't work at all. Is this because I don't have the .dot file
> for the file on my computer?
> Every time I try to set TOC levels they don't "stick".

Stick in what sense? No, you don't need the DOT file on your computer.
Specify the TOC entries using styles with the levels you want (eg use
Heading 1, Heading 2, etc). Define the TOC styles to look the way you want.
That's all there is for a vanilla TOC.

> Colleague also tells me that the doc adds continuous section breaks for no
> reason that he can find. I don't know what his skill level is, but he said
> he was on phone with MS for 2 hours.  Perhaps he simply has a broken/buggy
> template?

Word doesn't add section breaks for *no* reason. (The reason might be
obscure, but there will be one ... although it's not a problem I've ever
encountered.) Whatever the cause, it has nothing to do with his template.
Annamarie Pluhar - 01 Apr 2005 15:44 GMT
Hi

Thanks for responding. I've made progress and if my stupid mistakes can help
anyone else out I'm confessing. Mind you I'm working with a document that I
inherit from a colleague.

"Stick" in the sense that I specify the TOC entries for the styles and the
levels I want, (Insert/Tables and Indexes/Table of Contents/Options)  click
OK, and when I reopen the dialog box to specify the TOC entries they aren't
there.  I've done this over and over. However, I missed noticing that while
I was defining the styles "Chapter Title" and Chapter Sub-title" the Header
1, Header 2 and Header 3 were already assigned to TOC 1, 2 and 3
respectively.

Next problem is said colleague defined Chapter Subtitle with left and right
indents that caused a single column of characters to be the TOC 2 entry.

Once I figured that out it's been working fine.

Thanks.

> > TOC function won't work at all. Is this because I don't have the .dot file
> > for the file on my computer?
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> obscure, but there will be one ... although it's not a problem I've ever
> encountered.) Whatever the cause, it has nothing to do with his template.
Annamarie Pluhar - 01 Apr 2005 16:07 GMT
I take it back. The TOC entries aren't "sticking".... I'm wondering if it's
my application... ??

Do continuous section breaks get placed in a document as a result of setting
"keep with next" in the paragraph formatting of a Style?

Thanks

> Hi
>
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
> > obscure, but there will be one ... although it's not a problem I've ever
> > encountered.) Whatever the cause, it has nothing to do with his template.
Suzanne S. Barnhill - 01 Apr 2005 16:31 GMT
I believe your problem lies in "when I reopen the dialog box to specify the
TOC entries." You basically can't revisit this dialog. When you do, Word
wants to create a new TOC from scratch, so everything is always set back to
the default. You need to either get it right the first time or learn to edit
the TOC field manually; see
http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/Formatting/TOCSwitches.htm

Signature

Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so
all may benefit.

> Hi
>
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
> > obscure, but there will be one ... although it's not a problem I've ever
> > encountered.) Whatever the cause, it has nothing to do with his template.
Stefan Blom - 04 Apr 2005 10:13 GMT
If you want to revisit the Index and Tables dialog box without
actually creating a new TOC, you must delete the existing TOC first;
then you can recreate it with different settings. Usually, however, it
is quite sufficient to *update* the existing TOC to reflect changes in
your document.

In order to force an update of a table of contents, do the following:
right-click the TOC and choose to "Update field" (or, alternatively,
place the cursor inside the TOC and press F9). If Word presents a
dialog box, make sure that you specify that the entire table should be
updated.

Signature

Stefan Blom

> I believe your problem lies in "when I reopen the dialog box to specify the
> TOC entries." You basically can't revisit this dialog. When you do, Word
[quoted text clipped - 55 lines]
> > > encountered.) Whatever the cause, it has nothing to do with his
> template.
Suzanne S. Barnhill - 04 Apr 2005 16:11 GMT
> If you want to revisit the Index and Tables dialog box without
> actually creating a new TOC, you must delete the existing TOC first;
> then you can recreate it with different settings.

Hmm, that's seems a bit self-contradictory; if you delete the existing TOC,
then you *must* create a new one.

> Usually, however, it
> is quite sufficient to *update* the existing TOC to reflect changes in
> your document.

Not if you want to change the TOC itself (include more levels, omit some
headings). Updating merely changes the TOC, as is, to reflect the current
document content. If that content includes Level 1 paragraphs that you don't
want in the TOC, there are ways to deal with this outside the TOC dialog,
but the easiest way is to clear the 1 from the style in the TOC Options
dialog.

Signature

Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so
all may benefit.

> If you want to revisit the Index and Tables dialog box without
> actually creating a new TOC, you must delete the existing TOC first;
[quoted text clipped - 91 lines]
> > > > encountered.) Whatever the cause, it has nothing to do with his
> > template.
Stefan Blom - 05 Apr 2005 08:16 GMT
> > If you want to revisit the Index and Tables dialog box without
> > actually creating a new TOC, you must delete the existing TOC first;
> > then you can recreate it with different settings.
>
> Hmm, that's seems a bit self-contradictory; if you delete the existing TOC,
> then you *must* create a new one.

My point was that for inexperienced users, deleting and recreating the
TOC provides a way to modify TOC settings without messing with TOC
field codes.

> > Usually, however, it
> > is quite sufficient to *update* the existing TOC to reflect changes in
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> but the easiest way is to clear the 1 from the style in the TOC Options
> dialog.

Again, for inexperienced users, it is well worth stating explicitly
that updating a TOC is a possibility, if the goal is to make it
reflect the current document structure of a modified document. Of
course I didn't mean to say that updating would change the settings
(that would indeed be strange!). Perhaps making such a comment didn't
help in this particular case, though.

--
Stefan Blom

> > If you want to revisit the Index and Tables dialog box without
> > actually creating a new TOC, you must delete the existing TOC first;
[quoted text clipped - 91 lines]
> > > > > encountered.) Whatever the cause, it has nothing to do with his
> > > template.
Stefan Blom - 05 Apr 2005 09:08 GMT
An additional comment...

Suzanne, it is correct that the first paragraph of my initial response
was self-contradictory. It could more clearly be stated in the
following way: "If you want to revisit the Index and Tables dialog box
without creating a *second* TOC, you must delete the existing TOC
first; then you can recreate it with different settings."

Signature

Stefan Blom

> > > If you want to revisit the Index and Tables dialog box without
> > > actually creating a new TOC, you must delete the existing TOC
[quoted text clipped - 161 lines]
> his
> > > > template.
Suzanne S. Barnhill - 05 Apr 2005 18:27 GMT
Now that I'll buy! IMO this is a real defect in the Index and Tables dialog.
It should be possible, with the insertion point in an existing TOC, to
revisit the dialog and make changes. You can do this, of course, but then
Word asks if you want the "new" TOC to replace the existing one, which is
the only option. While that superficially accomplishes what you're after,
unless the problem of multiplying bookmarks has been solved (and I can't
recall that it has), then every time you replace the TOC, you've created a
whole new slew of bookmarks to clutter up the file. This is why it is really
useful for users who need TOCs often to learn to edit the TOC field (and
there are some effects that can be created *only* by doing that).

Signature

Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so
all may benefit.

> An additional comment...
>
[quoted text clipped - 182 lines]
> > his
> > > > > template.
Stefan Blom - 07 Apr 2005 13:32 GMT
> every time you replace the TOC,
> you've created a
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> there are some effects that can be created *only* by doing
> that).

Good point. I actually wasn't aware of the "bookmark problem"
with TOCs. (It is easy enough to verify that it still exists,
though.)

--
Stefan Blom

> Now that I'll buy! IMO this is a real defect in the Index and Tables dialog.
> It should be possible, with the insertion point in an existing TOC, to
[quoted text clipped - 65 lines]
> > > first;
> > > > > then you can recreate it with different settings.
Usually,
> > > however, it
> > > > > is quite sufficient to *update* the existing TOC to reflect
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks for responding. I've made progress and if my

stupid
> > > > > mistakes can
> > > > > > help
[quoted text clipped - 82 lines]
> > > his
> > > > > > template.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.