It's been unusable since whenever it was that they made it part of EscherArt
rather than a separate applet. It is well nigh impossible to make it
resemble ordinary text (which would be one of the chief uses for it since
you can't rotate ordinary text). There is no gallery selection that's
relatively unadorned that you can even start with. It's very difficult to
get rid of or change some of the effects on the fancier gallery selections.
I could go on.

Signature
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so
all may benefit.
> > Well, I posted without testing, since I use WordArt practically not at all
> > since it changed from something useful to something unusable.
>
> I generally don't have a need for it, but I have been recommending it.
> I'm curious - why do you consider it unusable? (Maybe I should stop
> recommending it!)
Character - 04 Mar 2006 05:06 GMT
> It's been unusable since whenever it was that they made it part of EscherArt
> rather than a separate applet. It is well nigh impossible to make it
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> get rid of or change some of the effects on the fancier gallery selections.
> I could go on.
Thanks for the enlightenment ..
Charles Kenyon - 04 Mar 2006 07:16 GMT
The second gallery option straightens out pretty well.

Signature
Charles Kenyon
Word New User FAQ & Web Directory: http://addbalance.com/word
Intermediate User's Guide to Microsoft Word (supplemented version of
Microsoft's Legal Users' Guide) http://addbalance.com/usersguide
See also the MVP FAQ: http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/ which is awesome!
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
This message is posted to a newsgroup. Please post replies
and questions to the newsgroup so that others can learn
from my ignorance and your wisdom.
> It's been unusable since whenever it was that they made it part of
> EscherArt
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>> I'm curious - why do you consider it unusable? (Maybe I should stop
>> recommending it!)
Suzanne S. Barnhill - 04 Mar 2006 14:56 GMT
Yes, I guess that's probably the best of a flamboyant lot. <g> Especially if
you change the font first. Thanks for pointing that out; somehow I'd been
overlooking it and trying to use the third one, though it's not too bad,
either. I just tend to use Publisher for anything that requires rotated
text.

Signature
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so
all may benefit.
> The second gallery option straightens out pretty well.
> > It's been unusable since whenever it was that they made it part of
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> >> I'm curious - why do you consider it unusable? (Maybe I should stop
> >> recommending it!)