The methods I am using are the primary point. I have described in plain
English what I want to do in the first posting. I have also provided multiple
examples. I am exceptionally knowledge in Office products and have been using
them from since they were developed. I also teach MS Office. However I ran
into this one exceptional problem that I could not figure out no matter what
I did.
I would like to take this opportunity to thank both you and Doug for your
time.
Sorry, but your post did NOT explain what you are trying to achieve; only
how you are trying to achieve it. Given that your method doesn't work, you
should try something else. But if you can't bring yourself to explain the
objective, there's no way to suggest what the 'something else' might be.
Lord have mercy on your students.
> The methods I am using are the primary point. I have described in plain
> English what I want to do in the first posting. I have also provided
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>>>>>>>> l
>>>>>>>>Table [overflow] l Page 2 [bookmarked]
Suzanne S. Barnhill - 29 May 2006 15:24 GMT
Why is it that my inclination to try to help dries up entirely when someone
writes "I am exceptionally knowledge in Office products and have been using
them from since they were developed. I also teach MS Office." and yet is
unable to clearly describe what he's intending to do or accept that there
might be a better way to do it? I think in this case one of the following is
applicable:
"As long as you always do what you do, you'll always get what you get."
"The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and
expecting different results."

Signature
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so
all may benefit.
> Sorry, but your post did NOT explain what you are trying to achieve; only
> how you are trying to achieve it. Given that your method doesn't work, you
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> >>>>>>>> l
> >>>>>>>>Table [overflow] l Page 2 [bookmarked]
Galebat - 30 May 2006 13:50 GMT
Being nasty is not a virtue.
The very first posting said, “I WANT TO ANCHOR BOOKMARK AND LINKED TO AND
FROM TEXT AT THE TOP OF WORD PAGES.” If you don’t know the answer, do not
reply to the question. All of my peers and colleagues had no difficulties
understand the question; they just did not know the answer.
This is my last response to you so please do not REPLY.
>Sorry, but your post did NOT explain what you are trying to achieve; only
>how you are trying to achieve it. Given that your method doesn't work, you
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>>>>>>>>> l
>>>>>>>>>Table [overflow] l Page 2 [bookmarked]
Suzanne S. Barnhill - 30 May 2006 14:31 GMT
And from the very begining this (shouted) text has not made any grammatical
sense, which is part of the problem we're having with it.

Signature
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so
all may benefit.
> Being nasty is not a virtue.
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> >>>>>>>>> l
> >>>>>>>>>Table [overflow] l Page 2 [bookmarked]
Jezebel - 31 May 2006 01:18 GMT
For someone who claims to be an expert in Word to suggest that "ANCHOR
BOOKMARK AND LINKED TO AND FROM TEXT AT THE TOP OF WORD PAGES" as a useful
statement of objective is just sad. Doubly so if this is your standard of
teaching.
> Being nasty is not a virtue.
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>>>>>>>>>> l
>>>>>>>>>>Table [overflow] l Page 2 [bookmarked]