> You didn't identify your word version.
>
> The table sort feature allows you to specify your sort type as a date sort
> (ascending/descending).
Follow-up (by o.p.):
I could not solve this with any variation of 'sort' parameters, so -- since
I had to get the table sorted -- I cloned the date column and through a
series of 'find/replace' operations (using wildcards) created a second 'date'
column with only the year (4 digits -- e.g., 1999, 2003, etc.). I then used
that to get the 'sort' done.
That obviously should not have been necessary. I have been reviewing the
original sort results and they are just bizarre -- as I described them above.
The sort works correctly for February 1999 (2/99, the earliest date in the
table) through January 2001 (1/01). Then, instead of going from 1/01 to
2/01, 3/01, 4/01, etc. it goes from 1/01 to 1/02, 1/03, 1/04, etc. -- i.e.,
as previously mentioned, the 'sort' starts prioritizing on the 'month'
instead of the 'year.'
Are there documented bugs with WORD 97's 'sort' feature that might account
for this?
Tom Conrad - 21 Sep 2007 14:32 GMT
A belated follow-up. I have been traveling and disconnected.
I am not aware of any W-97 sorting issues, although I have experienced
bizarre sorting results in long tables. It could be a memory thing, or it
could be caused by table length.

Signature
Tom Conrad
> Follow-up (by o.p.):
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Are there documented bugs with WORD 97's 'sort' feature that might account
> for this?
Steve_Ray - 22 Sep 2007 03:24 GMT
> I am not aware of any W-97 sorting issues, although I have experienced
> bizarre sorting results in long tables. It could be a memory thing, or it
> could be caused by table length.
Thanks for your follow-up. Under the circumstances (and since I have not
received other replies suggesting other possible explanations) I think it
must in fact be that -- i.e., "bizarre sorting results in long tables".
Given that the sort works okay on the first part of the table (i.e., the
earliest chronological records) and then seems to lose its way and from that
point on sorts incorrectly, it's hard to imagine what else it could be.