> Karl E. Peterson was telling us:
> Karl E. Peterson nous racontait que :
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I think that Doug is referring to a password set to the template
> project.

Signature
Working without a .NET?
http://classicvb.org/
Karl E. Peterson was telling us:
Karl E. Peterson nous racontait que :
>> Karl E. Peterson was telling us:
>> Karl E. Peterson nous racontait que :
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> That was my first thought, as well, but those provide no real
> protection at all?
Yes, but most people do not know that.
In this case, if protecting the code from prying eyes is important, the
whole project should be compiled in a DLL...

Signature
Salut!
_______________________________________
Jean-Guy Marcil - Word MVP
jmarcilREMOVE@CAPSsympatico.caTHISTOO
Word MVP site: http://www.word.mvps.org
Karl E. Peterson - 07 Sep 2006 21:11 GMT
> Karl E. Peterson was telling us:
> Karl E. Peterson nous racontait que :
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Yes, but most people do not know that.
If by most you mean those who aren't likely to be trying to break into the
projects, you're probably right. But don't kid yourself. Anyone who
*wants* to get in, will.
I know I've had clients who were totally unaware. I'd download their
"protected" samples, and within moments start telling them what's wrong with
the code, much to their dismay.
> In this case, if protecting the code from prying eyes is important,
> the whole project should be compiled in a DLL...
Key portions, at least, yep. I've helped a good number of folks set that
sort of thing up. The key is education, and not letting folks feel a sense
of false security.

Signature
Working without a .NET?
http://classicvb.org/