
Signature
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
Graham Mayor - Word MVP
My web site www.gmayor.com
Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
Hi Graham,
I don't have Word 2003 on my PC at the moment so I can't repeat what
happened. At the time, I had a text box filled with black, with
non-black text in it. This was written and saved in Word 2003 with the
Windows 97 compatiblity option set, and the text appeared fine in Word
2003, but when I emailed it to someone with Word 97, they couldn't see
the writing in the text box. Also, every time I made a modification to
the document (before I realised there was a font incompatibility
problem) and saved the document, I would get this warning from
Word2003, which didn't locate the source. I would have thought that if
Word2003 had used the closest colour, this would be true when looking
at it with Word 2003, so I would have seen the problem in both
versions of Word.
Thanks for taking the trouble to reproduce the problem.
Best wishes,
Jay
> This is not strictly true - if you disable features introduced after 97 and
> use the example you quote, then the document is *not* saved with the
> unsupported font colours, but is saved with the closest compatible colour -
> this is clearly indicated in the warning box.
Graham Mayor - 13 Oct 2005 07:22 GMT
Hmmm. I don't have Word 97 here, but I have tested with Word 2003, using a
black filled text box and a non-compatible yellow text and although the
yellow text was asjusted to a compatible colour it was still readable after
the conversion. I suppose there may be some unfortunate colour combinations
that would be unreadable, but this wasn't one ;)

Signature
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
Graham Mayor - Word MVP
My web site www.gmayor.com
Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
> Hi Graham,
>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>> with the unsupported font colours, but is saved with the closest
>> compatible colour - this is clearly indicated in the warning box.